Showing posts with label Car and Driver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Car and Driver. Show all posts

Car and Driver Reviews the 2013 Honda Accord Coupe Concept


We like our Honda Accords around here, having awarded the car no fewer than 26 10Best awards, including in all five model years of the current generation. And so it was with keen interest that we watched Honda preview the ninth generation of the Accord at the 2012 Detroit auto show in the form of this coupe concept. Rendered in a gorgeous deep satin red with lots of glitzy chrome, the Accord coupe concept was not driven on stage but rather hurled like a curling stone toward the audience on a rotating platform, providing a 360-degree look at the car that will go on sale by the end of the calendar year.

Based on this show car, the 2013 Accord will be instantly familiar to anyone who’s seen the car we have today. But the sharp creases of the current model look to be augmented with a few more curves, most notably in the line that rises over the rear wheel and the kick-up from the rocker panel. Also, apparently the front and rear ends will look exactly the same. The next Accord coupe will be roughly the same size as now, but Honda says that the sedan will be shorter in length and lighter. The latter will face some of its stiffest—and best-looking—competition yet in the form of the 2013 Ford Fusion, the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu, and the 2012 VW Passat, to name a few, so to stand relatively still in the styling department places even more importance on what is found under the Accord’s skin.

Two All-New Gasoline Engines
What we’ll find between the doors remains purely hypothetical at this point, as we weren’t allowed a peek inside the concept. But somewhat surprisingly—or perhaps not, for a company eager to prove it can still produce world-class powertrains—Honda revealed some information on what to expect under the hood. Big H says that the 2013 Accord will offer two all-new gas engines, including the first U.S. application of its direct-injected 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine with 181 hp and 177 lb-ft of torque. (The current base four-pot makes 177 hp and 161 lb-ft of torque.) It will come paired with either a six-speed manual or a CVT that Honda promises will be “fun,” which, if true, would be a minor miracle.

While key competitors are abandoning larger engines in favor of fully four-cylinder lineups, the next Accord will again offer a naturally aspirated V-6. We’ll note here that only four-cylinder Accord models were awarded a 10Best prize this year, so our narcissistic side says that Honda is trying to get back into our good graces with a re-engineered version of its 3.5-liter V-6—and by offering it with a choice of six-speed automatic and manual (hooray!) transmissions. Honda added that V-6 models equipped with the six-speed automatic will feature cylinder deactivation. As for efficiency, the automaker says that all four-cylinder and V-6/automatic models will deliver best-in-class fuel economy.

Return of the Accord Hybrid—This Time as a Plug-In
The next-gen Accord also will offer a plug-in hybrid option starting next winter, with a 2.0-liter Atkinson cycle four-cylinder paired to a 120-kW electric motor and a 6-kWh lithium-ion battery. There will be three distinct driving modes: fully electric, hybrid, and “direct drive,” which will allow the driver to remove electricity from the propulsion equation. The Accord is said to be able to drive 10 to 15 miles on electricity alone so long as speeds don’t climb beyond 62 mph and, we presume, you don’t do much more than breathe on the accelerator. In addition to the usual on-the-fly power regeneration, charging of the battery should take less than 1.5 hours on a 240-volt charger, according to Honda.

All models, regardless of cylinder count or battery assist, will feature “Eco Assist” driving modes with an “Eco” button providing more efficient operation as well as visual indicators to encourage a kinder, gentler driving style. The next Accord also will offer safety features such as lane-departure and collision warning systems. Finally, Honda promises a new full-color “intelligent” multi-information display by which owners will be able to control their smartphones and apps such as Pandora.

We’re looking forward to seeing the final product, but it won’t be until we slide behind the wheel that we’ll have an idea whether the next Accord is good enough to capture a 27th 10Best trophy.

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/2013-honda-accord-coupe-concept-photos-and-info-news

Car and Driver: Ford Evos Concept - Auto Shows

Wow....

Good genes: Ford’s Frankfurt debutant defines a new design language for its global products.

BY STEVE SILER



At the 2005 Frankfurt auto show, Ford’s stunning Iosis concept car debuted the company’s “Kinetic” design language, which shortly thereafter debuted on non-U.S. models like the Mondeo, European Focus, C-Max, and Kuga. Our first taste of Kinetic design came more recently with the 2011 Fiesta and 2012 Focus models. But now Ford’s look is evolving, with another Frankfurt concept—the 2011 show’s gorgeous and aptly named Evos—previewing the next evolution (get it?) of Blue Oval design.



Sadly, the company won’t go so far as to adapt the Evos’s quad butterfly doors for production. But this fastback four-seater, which is shorter than a Focus sedan but wider than a Porsche Panamera, does embody a half dozen newly defined pillars of Ford global design—which will drop the Kinetic moniker. The Evos will provide the template for future Fords, and so we took a virtual tour of the car with Ford design chief J Mays, who explained those design pillars.



Ford’s New Global Design Language, Explained

The first two pillars of Ford’s new design language are “silhouette innovation” and “perceived efficiency.” The former, according to Mays, represents a profile “that defines your automobile and looks different than most of the other cars in a particular class on the road,” while the latter equates to visual lightness and sleekness. “We’d like to have lightweight pillars [and] a teardrop cabin [where] the lines on the side disappear at a vanishing point somewhere around 100 yards behind the car.” The gist? Think less ‘traditional three-box sedan’ and more ‘four-door coupe.’



“Refined surface language” refers to a smoothing out of Kinetically sculpted body surfaces, among them the architectural fenders, creased door skins, and sculpted hoods. This directive also appears to be a reaction to other manufacturers that Mays claims have “annexed” and subsequently exaggerated Ford’s Kinetic motifs. Ford is going in “exactly the opposite direction” now, he said, keeping what he called the “excitement” of Kinetic design but rendered in “beautiful shapes you’d love to run your hands over.”



An emphasis on the fourth pillar, “technical graphics,” basically refers to the lamps and lower body addenda. “Headlamps seem to be growing to absurd proportions,” said Mays. “They’ve become less about technology and more about design flourish and style. And we think that’s reached its complete evolution. So we’re going to the minimal height for the headlamps and the taillamps and we’re going to let the technology speak for the graphics rather than overt style.” The headlamps on the Evos are rendered in LEDs “designed in such a way that you probably haven’t seen before.” Will every future Ford model get “razor-cut” headlamps such as these? Yes, and Mays told us that he is committed to LED headlamps on every new Ford, although we’ll have to see if those make it past the accountants.



The final two newly defined design-isms are the “new face of Ford,” which involves pulling the trapezoid grille way up to the leading edge of the hood (it gives the Evos a sort of Mustang-esque shark nose), and a “visual sense of premium quality,” which—besides being less catchy than the others—basically means creating the sort of designs people associate with higher-end cars. “We’ve tried to eliminate one of the grilles on the vehicle, and focus on the other. And what that does is allow us to have a smaller inlet, gives us better aerodynamics, and also, I think, looks much more premium.”



If roadgoing Fords end up looking like the Evos, we say “mission accomplished” to the premium bit. Indeed, more than a few of us think that the “new face of Ford” looks a lot like the current face of Aston Martin, particularly, the slim, six-sided grille and Rapide-esque roofline. Could Ford be suffering from a case of “seller’s remorse” after getting rid of Aston Martin during the great fire sale of 2008? Mays didn’t admit any such—to borrow his own term—annexation of Aston’s designs, but when asked about the similarities, he seemed rather comfortable with the comparison.



Head in the “Cloud”

However Aston-y the Evos looks, it wouldn’t be a show car if it didn’t contain a boatload of future tech. Cloud-based connectivity supposedly helps the Evos identify and pre-arrange its various systems to match the preferences of the upcoming drive, thus promising “seamless connectivity” from home to car to office, which may or may not be a good thing. It also gauges the skills of the driver and, reconciling them with weather and road conditions, adjusts the powertrain and chassis to maintain “optimum safety”—which sounds a bit Hal 9000 to us. Then there are the “driver wellness” features, too, which include a heart-rate monitor; the car is able to use current and previous data via the cloud to monitor “the physical state and workload of the driver and adjusts the driving experience accordingly.” To the good, if you start driving aggressively, the Evos will also simplify the gauge cluster to provide only necessary info and switch the driver’s phone to “do not disturb mode.”



The Evos is powered by—what else?—the cloud. Just kidding. It features a lithium-ion-based, plug-in gas/electric powertrain that’s said to be able to deliver extended-range or parallel-hybrid propulsion, ultimately delivering the same sort of fuel economy as the Ford C-Max Energi that’s scheduled to arrive stateside next year. Ford gave no more details on the powertrain beyond this: The cloud would theoretically be heavily involved, directing the car when to make various on-the-fly powertrain adjustments, such as switching to electric mode when driving into a city center that may have emissions restrictions.



We won’t have to wait long to see the look previewed here on a saleable Ford product. The 2013 Fusion will be the first Ford to wear the new design language; we expect to see that car next January at the Detroit show. In the meantime, if you can make it to Frankfurt, check out the Evos—it’s a stunner.



Source;

http://www.caranddriver.com/news/car/11q3/ford_evos_concept-auto_shows

Car and Driver: 2012 Honda CRV

2012 Honda CR-V Spy Photos - Future Cars

Honda continues its trend of gentle evolution with the next-gen CR-V.

BY JUSTIN BERKOWITZ, PHOTOGRAPHY BY ROBERT WHITLEY AND THE MANUFACTURER
May 2011

A fearless Car and Driver reader in Washington, D.C., snapped this picture of the next-generation Honda CR-V crossover, which will debut this fall. The vehicle looks ready for production, wearing its own sheetmetal (rather than the modified body of an existing Honda model) with the badge buried in tape on the tailgate.

Like other Japanese auto companies, Honda is as tight-lipped as can be about its future products. We’re left to use recent history and this photo to determine that the next CR-V will represent a gentle update to the current car, rather than a radical redo.

Figure on a naturally aspirated four-cylinder being the only engine available. It should displace 2.4 liters like today’s CR-V engine, and we expect it to make between 180 and 200 hp—although the number may be closer to the bottom end of that range. Fuel economy also should improve slightly; in front-drive spec, the current model is rated for 21 mpg city and 28 mpg highway. (All-wheel-drivers are rated for 21/27.)

If there are any major changes to the upcoming CR-V, it could be in the seating layout. Until now, every CR-V has been a strictly five-seat affair. Given the long rear overhang of the car in this photo, however, it looks like there just might be room for a small third row of seats for short-legged passengers. Toyota sells a three-row RAV4, but most others in the segment serve a maximum of five.

Few would call the CR-V in its present form a pulse-raising vehicle, but it’s a staple for Honda, offers good driving dynamics, and is a sensible choice for more than 200,000 Americans per year. Even without concrete details on the next-generation CR-V, we feel confident saying it will maintain the current car’s sales success. We expect the 2012 CR-V to debut at the Los Angeles auto show this November.

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/spied/11q2/2012_honda_cr-v_spy_photos-future_cars

Car and Driver: 2011 Chrysler Town & Country vs. Honda Odyssey, Nissan Quest, Toyota Sienna - Comparison Tests

Really comprehensive article with a ton of pics (follow the links) that take you right there....
Family Planning: Minivans throw fashion to the wind. But nothing can match their kid-hauling utility.
BY MICHAEL AUSTIN, PHOTOGRAPHY BY MARC URBANO April 2011

Guess what? Minivans are still uncool. Automakers know this. Even the latest ads for the Honda Odyssey and the Toyota Sienna acknowledge the squareness of the segment. Sales have stabilized at about 500,000 units per year since tragically hip moms and dads fled to crossovers.

As a mature segment with little potential for growth, minivans are getting comfortable with their squareness. For evidence, we direct your attention to the new Nissan Quest, which not only acknowledges its one-box silhouette but drapes a metaphorical trench coat over the whole thing.
So minivans are cool with being uncool. Can we move on? The premise remains the same as before: Maximize people and cargo space, and forget about the styling. Driving dynamics get second billing. The point is to get you and your kids (or, for aging boomers, your dogs) to and from every destination with the least amount of hassle and the most comfort.

The newest in our assembled quartet is the Nissan Quest, back after a two-year hiatus. Now based on the company’s D platform (shared with the Altima, Maxima, and Murano), the Quest is similar to the Japanese-market Elgrand. For 2011, the Chrysler Town & Country (and its sibling, the Dodge Grand Caravan) gets freshened exterior and interior styling, a retuned suspension, and—most important—a new 283-hp V-6 mated to a six-speed automatic, which replaces all three previous powertrain offerings.

The Odyssey and the Sienna are also new for the 2011 model year, but both offer carry-over engines lashed to new six-speed automatics (available only in Touring trim on the Honda).

There’s a lot of common ground among this set. All four are powered by 24-valve V-6 engines, with only 35 horsepower separating the strongest (Chrysler) from the weakest (Honda). In the top-of-the-line trims we specified for our test group, each minivan comes with power side doors and a power rear hatch. They all offer some sort of flat load floor when the seats are folded and/or removed.

It’s worth noting that although the vans tested here all ring in at about $40,000, each can be had for closer to $30,000. The price of the Sienna, the highest in this test, drops as low as $25,370 for a base four-cylinder model.

In light of the targeted use of these vehicles, we focused on the passenger compartments as much as we did on behind-the-wheel impressions. We watched Team America: World Police multiple times in an effort to evaluate the rear-seat entertainment systems. We also wore a pregnancy-simulation vest while examining each minivan for ease of child-seat installation. And yes, we left some small part of our dignity behind these sliding doors.

4th Place: 2011 Toyota Sienna Limited
Highs: Barcalounger second-row seat, two glove boxes, parking-lot friendly.
Lows: Cheesy-looking fake wood, light on refinement, bland as a Camry.
The Verdict: Looks great on paper but fails to inspire in person.
Full review of the Toyota;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/11q1/2011_chrysler_town_country_vs._honda_odyssey_nissan_quest_toyota_sienna-comparison_tests/2011_toyota_sienna_limited_page_2

3rd Place: 2011 Nissan Quest LE
Highs: Funky styling, tight turning radius, comfortable front seats.
Lows: Low-rent center-console plastics, only one 12-volt power port in front.
The Verdict: Not the Holy Grail of minivans but headed in the right direction.

For the full review on the Nissan;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/11q1/2011_chrysler_town_country_vs._honda_odyssey_nissan_quest_toyota_sienna-comparison_tests/2011_nissan_quest_le_page_3

2nd Place: 2011 Chrysler Town & Country Limited
Highs: Sporty steering, balanced chassis, high level of refinement.
Lows: Underwhelming engine power, dowdy exterior styling.
The Verdict: Chrysler fixed everything that was wrong and kept everything that was right.

For the full review on the Dodge;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/11q1/2011_chrysler_town_country_vs._honda_odyssey_nissan_quest_toyota_sienna-comparison_tests/2011_chrysler_town_26_country_limited_page_4

1st Place: 2011 Honda Odyssey Touring Elite
Highs: Excellent ergonomics, seating for eight, trick folding third row.
Lows: Slow and numb steering, contrived exterior styling.
The Verdict: Good for drivers, great for passengers.

For the full review on the Honda;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/11q1/2011_chrysler_town_country_vs._honda_odyssey_nissan_quest_toyota_sienna-comparison_tests/2011_honda_odyssey_touring_elite_page_5

Car and Driver: Honda Civic Si Coupe and Civic Sedan Concepts - Auto Shows

And now for car and driver's take....
This pair of Detroit concepts point directly to the next-gen 2012 Civic, which will come in regular, Si, hybrid, and natural-gas versions.
BY TONY SWAN, PHOTOGRAPHY BY PATRICK M. HOEY AND THE MANUFACTURER January 2011
The Honda Civic, a perennial compact bestseller, is being readied for a major makeover, and this is essentially what the coupe and sedan will look like when they go on sale this spring as 2012 models. We say essentially, because the cars unveiled at the 2011 North American International Auto Show in Detroit—coupe and sedan body styles—were presented as concepts.

This is typical Honda preview tease, but aside from the 19-inch wheels and some minor exterior trim, the concepts are very faithful representatives of the production cars’ styling. Clearly, Honda was going for an evolutionary take on the current Civic’s shape. Also typical of Honda preview, very little substance accompanied the showbiz reveal ceremony. No specifications, no price info.

Insider Tips and Guesstimating
However, we do have some insider hints regarding these preview princesses, as well as some educated guesses. Honda verified that these cars will actually be slightly smaller than the old models, and lighter, too; our guesswork has us figuring on updates in chassis rigidity, improved aerodynamics, improved crashworthiness, more refinement, and continued high marks for fun-to-drive.

What we do know about powertrains and model availability: The sedan and coupe will both be available in workaday variants, and the Si coupe concept shown here clearly heralds the return of that hopped-up model. Honda also said that the 2012 Civic sedan will come in three additional flavors: Si, hybrid, and natural-gas.

The hybrid will upgrade to lithium-ion batteries (from NiMH) and the latest version of Big H’s Integrated Motor Assist hybrid system, and the availability of the natural-gas Civic GX will be broadened to cover the entire country. (The current GX is available only in Oklahoma, Utah, New York, and California.) No detail was given on the base or Si models’ i-VTEC gas engines or transmissions, although Honda did say they’d be more fuel-efficient. We figure on evolutionary changes yielding small power increases, plus five- and six-speed manual transmissions and a new six-speed automatic in place of the old five-speeder.
It will be a while before Honda reveals any pricing info, but we estimate a base sticker of about $17,000 for the entry sedan and coupe, soaring to over $25K for top-spec trims. Hot-rod Si models will probably start at a little over $23,000.

This will be the ninth generation of Honda’s Civic line, which dates to 1973. Although it constantly battles Toyota’s Corolla in the compact sales charts, the Civic’s blend of thrifty operation, durability, innovation, value, and lively dynamics have made it a long-time Car and Driver favorite and a five-time 10Best winner. We’re looking forward to seeing if this latest one picks up the mantle.
Source;

Car and Driver: 2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon - First Drive Review

A charming new chapter in the station wagon revival.
BY TONY SWAN December 2010

At first glance, a traditional mid-size station wagon is unexpected from a company that’s scoring its best sales numbers with a crossover, the MDX. Considering there hasn’t been a conventional wagon in the U.S. Honda and Acura lineup since the fifth-generation Accord, which ended its run at the conclusion of the 1997 model year, the TSX wagon seems even more surprising.

But Acura knows not all the young, affluent small-family types out there are smitten with crossovers. There are at least a half-dozen traditional station wagons in the entry premium category—base prices range from about $30,000 to $40,000—and there’s potential for great growth if, well, if people would just realize how much better wagons are than SUVs.

Sport with a Small S

Acura didn’t create this car from scratch. Like the TSX sedan, the new wagon is a luxed-up version of the European Honda Accord. But there’s an asterisk. Unlike the sedan, which has charmed C/D staffers through two generations now, the wagon comes up a little short on the sporty score sheet. Agile: check. Competent: check. Quick, communicative steering: check. Excellent brake-pedal feel: check. No surprises: check. Comfort, quiet operation, and lots of standard features: check, check, and check.

Acceleration: not so fast. When it goes on sale December 21, the TSX wagon will offer a single powertrain—the base 201-hp, 2.4-liter four mated with a five-speed automatic. No manual transmission option. No V-6 option. With its modest torque, the 2.4-liter four isn’t an engine that’s likely to provoke acceleration brownouts or smoky burnouts. Paired in the sedan with the six-speed manual gearbox, a very slick unit in the best Honda tradition, it provides acceptable go amplified by the pleasure of engaging the right gear for the rather narrow power band.

Bolted to the automatic, though, the four-cylinder produces forward progress that’s distinctly more deliberate. And adding mass to the equation—Acura lists the wagon’s curb weight at 3599 pounds, 129 more than the four-cylinder automatic sedan’s and 199 more than the manual sedan’s—doesn’t make the going any quicker. Two-lane passing requires careful planning, and it’s hard to see the wagon as a weapon of choice for the free-for-all commuter.

If the absence of a manual transmission is disappointing, Acura’s rationale is hard to dispute. For one, even though most of the wagon’s major competitors offer do-it-yourself shifting, the take rate for the manual TSX sedan has dwindled to less than 3 percent, according to Acura. Second, Acura’s business case for the wagon is tentative—4000 units for 2011—making it important to keep the build orders simple. Four of the car’s prime competitors offer traction at both ends, but Acura has no plans to offer all-wheel drive on the TSX sedan or wagon.

The Good News

Although blistering performance may not be part of the deal, there is nevertheless a lot about the car to like. The wagon is 3.6 inches longer than the sedan and delivers far more cargo capacity. There are 26 cubic feet behind the rear seats, with a flat load floor, several tie-down points, and more storage under the floor. With the seats folded flat, the cargo well expands to 61 cubic feet, as good as anything in this class and bigger than most.

And, like other Acuras, the TSX wagon is well equipped. The base price of $31,820—that’s near the low end of the competitive spectrum and $1350 more than a sedan—includes a satisfying array of standard luxo features. There’s only one option, the Technology package, which adds $3650 to the sticker and navigation and ultra-high-end audio to the equipment list. The wagon is a tad thirstier than the four-cylinder sedan—22 mpg city and 30 highway, according to the EPA, versus 22/31—but is still near the top of the competitive charts.

The final plus: This is arguably the best-looking member of the TSX lineup and is close to the Audi A4 for visual leadership in the class. Acura has toned down the TSX’s lamentably beaky chrome grille for 2011, and the canted rear hatch adds a zoomy look to the package in addition to enhancing rear cargo access. A manual-transmission choice would make the station wagon more entertaining in our view, but the other TSX virtues are intact—and simply being a station wagon is a virtue unto itself.

Source (with a ton of pic's);
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10q4/2011_acura_tsx_sport_wagon-first_drive_review

Honda Accord and Fit Receive Car and Driver Magazine's "10Best Cars" Awards

Car and Driver magazine has named the 2011 Honda Accord and the 2011 Honda Fit as two winners of its prestigious and highly competitive, annual "10Best Cars" award. Now in its eighth generation, the Accord has achieved "10Best" status 25 times in the 29 years that Car and Driver editors have been conducting the competition, more than any other vehicle in the award's history. The Honda Fit has been honored with 10Best status in each of the five years that it has been on sale in the United States.

"The Car and Driver '10Best' awards are among the most coveted awards in the industry," said John Mendel, executive vice president of American Honda Motor Co., Inc. "These awards recognize the company's ongoing emphasis on performance, quality and safety, and Honda is honored to have its vehicles regarded so highly over the years."
Honda Car and Driver "10Best" Award History
Accord
2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1995, 1994,1991, 1990, 1989, 1988, 1987, 1986, 1985, 1984, 1983
Civic
1996, 1991,1990, 1989, 1988
CRX
1988, 1985
Fit
2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007
Prelude
1998, 1997, 1996, 1995,1994,1993, 1992, 1986, 1985, 1984
S2000
2004, 2002, 2001, 2000
Source;

Car and Driver: 2010 Editors Choice Awards

Are you in the market for a new car or truck? Now you can see what we at Car and Driver would choose to drive if we were shopping for new wheels today. We conducted rigorous instrumented testing and editorial evaluation of hundreds of 2010 model-year vehicles, including all the Editors' Choice picks and their competitors.

These alphabetical lists aren’t static. We will adjust our rankings continuously to reflect the merits of new vehicles as they come on the market, providing a real-time look at what we consider to the top entries in any given market segment. To that end, you may notice that we’ve marked several vehicles as Ones to Watch. Those are vehicles we have yet to either fully test or directly compare against the competition, but that we feel show a lot of promise.

Winners are chosen based on three criteria: practicality, value, and driver satisfaction, and they highlight our editors’ favorite rides in 20 vehicle categories, ranging from small cars to family sedans to exotic sports cars—and more. Click on a vehicle name below to go directly to our comprehensive Buyer’s Guide, where you can get full specs, pricing, capsule reviews, and more on every vehicle chosen as a 2010 Car and Driver Editors' Choice.


SMALL CARS
Honda Civic
Honda Fit
Mazda 3
Nissan Versa
Volkswagen Golf

FUEL SIPPERS
Ford Fusion hybrid
Honda Fit
Honda Insight
Toyota Prius
Volkswagen Jetta TDI

ENTRY LUXURY
Acura TSX
Audi A4
BMW 3-series
Cadillac CTS
Infiniti G37

FAMILY SEDANS
Chevrolet Malibu
Honda Accord
Ford Fusion
Mazda 6
One to Watch: Hyundai Sonata (2011)

SPORTS SEDANS
BMW M3
Cadillac CTS-V
Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG
Porsche Panamera

SUPERCARS
Bugatti Veyron 16.4
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
Ferrari 458 Italia
Ferrari 599GTB Fiorano
Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4

LUXURY SEDANS
Audi A6
BMW 5-series
BMW 7-series
Mercedes-Benz S-class
Infiniti M (2011)

PERFORMANCE COMPACTS
BMW 1-series
Chevrolet Cobalt SS
Mazdaspeed 3
Subaru Impreza WRX
Volkswagen GTI

CONVERTIBLES
Audi A5/S5
BMW 1-series
BMW 3-series/M3
Ford Mustang
Mercedes-Benz SL-class

AMERICAN MUSCLE
Cadillac CTS-V
Chevrolet Camaro
Dodge Challenger SRT8
Ford Mustang GT
Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8

SPORTS CARS
Audi TTS
Chevrolet Corvette
Mazda MX-5 Miata
Nissan 370Z
Porsche Boxster

PREMIUM COUPES
Audi R8
BMW M3
Maserati GranTurismo
Porsche Cayman
Porsche 911

TRACK STARS
Chevrolet Cobalt SS
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
Dodge Viper SRT10 ACR
Lotus Elise/Exige
Nissan GT-R

SUPERCARS
Bugatti Veyron 16.4
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
Ferrari 599GTB Fiorano
Ferrari 458 Italia
Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4

SMALL SUVs
Chevrolet Equinox
Honda CR-V
Subaru Forester
Toyota RAV4
Volkswagen Tiguan

MID-SIZE SUVs
Honda Pilot
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-9
Nissan Murano
One to Watch: Jeep Grand Cherokee (2011)

LARGE SUVs
Chevrolet Tahoe/Suburban
Ford Expedition/EL
Ford Flex
Nissan Armada
Toyota Sequoia

LUXURY SUVs
Acura MDX
Audi Q5
BMW X5
Land Rover Range Rover
Mercedes-Benz GL-class

PICKUPS
Chevrolet Silverado
Dodge Ram
Ford F-150
Honda Ridgeline
Nissan Titan

VANS
Ford Transit Connect
Honda Odyssey
Mazda 5
Mercedes-Benz Sprinter
Toyota Sienna

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/09q4/2010_editors_choice-awards

Car and Driver: 2011 Honda Odyssey First Drive

Wow, does the 11 Odyssey ever look good in the Red....
Not exactly all-new, but still all good and still exactly what a minivan should be

When redesigning a vehicle that doesn’t need much improvement, engineers have extra time on their hands. Case in point: The Odyssey’s interior team spent some of theirs measuring 800 purses, ensuring that 80 percent of women’s (and some men’s) carryalls would fit in a new removable bin between the front seats.

Before they could tackle the cabin, though, a little exterior shape-shifting was required, just for the sake of freshness. The wheelbase is unchanged, but the van is almost an inch longer overall, more than two inches wider, and lower by about half an inch. Roof rails are no longer included from the factory, which helps reduce visual height even further. (Roof rails and crossbars are now available exclusively from the dealer; we were told that only a small percentage of previous-gen Odyssey buyers opted for the bars.) The sleek, updated design is dominated by a “lightning bolt” character line intended to make the Odyssey recognizable from afar while also lowering the glass to improve the view for third-row passengers. That assumes they can be persuaded to avert their gaze from the newly available, 16.2-inch widescreen video display. Road-trip time-passing mainstays I Spy and Geography are all but officially obsolete.

Bigger, Longer, Lighter
Although the van is larger overall, Honda managed to reduce weight through the use of more high-strength steel and by trimming poundage wherever possible. Mass is down by a claimed 50 to 100 pounds, depending on trim. Despite having less mass to stop, the brake discs are larger by almost an inch all around. The pedal is firmer, too, and offers more feedback compared with that of the already good 2010 Odyssey.

Considerable chassis-stiffness improvements, as well track increases, led to retuned front and rear independent suspensions that now use bypass-valve-equipped dampers to better soak up harsh impacts. The ride is as comfortable and poised as before, with body roll remaining minimal for a minivan. A new variable-displacement power-steering pump reduces effort slightly, but a bit of steering feel has been lost along with it; the average minivan buyer likely won’t mind, and the Odyssey remains the driver’s choice in the segment. (You may recall that the outgoing model won our most recent minivan comparo.)

Honda’s cylinder-deactivating, 3.5-liter V-6 is now standard across the lineup, with output up four hp and five lb-ft of torque, thanks to a two-stage intake and reduced internal and accessory losses. Apparently not content with offering a single powertrain for all Odysseys, Honda has introduced an additional forward gear ratio—for a total of six—for the Touring and new top-spec Touring Elite. The six-speed’s wider spread helps wring a bit more out of the engine and, along with some Touring-specific aerodynamic massagery, grants the models a 1-mpg advantage in EPA ratings over the five-speed-equipped LX and EX models. All 2011 Odysseys gain a pretty notable 2 to 4 mpg in EPA city and highway figures.

Road-Tripping to Ithaca
The interior, though, is where the magic happens in minivans. (Or is its necessity the result of magic already happening?) This one, unlike those of previous Odysseys, has been designed by Americans, for Americans. The dash layout is cleaner, simpler, and more symmetrical, while the gear selector has been moved down slightly. Thoughtful touches include the aforementioned removable center console—its deployable trash-bag ring provides a destination for empties from the 15 bottle and cup holders—and a cooling box at the base of the center stack.

The second row’s center seat is four inches wider and can be slid toward the front seats for more meaningful parent-child interaction. Folding the center section is less of a hassle, as it no longer requires the removal of the seat-bottom cushion—there also are three cup holders in the seatback-as-armrest that results. Meanwhile, the outboard chairs can be repositioned doorward to initiate “wide mode,” allowing for three-across American adults or a trio of kid seats. (The Odyssey is the first minivan to offer as many as five LATCH positions for car seats.) Assuming no kiddie chairs are in the way, passage to the rearmost bench has been widened by an inch. An easier-to-operate Magic Seat mechanism makes stowing either side of the 60/40 split third row a one-yank operation.

Seven Trims, No Waiting
Honda has adjusted the trim-level offerings for 2011 as well, killing the EX-L model with navigation and rear entertainment and adding the Touring Elite model at the top of the range. Base LX models ($28,580) do without the new front center console and instead pack a pair of floor-mounted cup holders; they also lack the second-row center seat and therefore seat only seven. Moving to the $31,730 EX brings the console and the eighth seat, and it also features power sliding doors and power lumbar for the driver’s seat. The EX-L adds leather, the cooling box, a USB audio interface, and Bluetooth, and costs $35,230. There’s still an EX-L with rear entertainment ($36,830) and one with navigation and a rearview camera ($37,230). But to know where you’re going while also being able to entertain the kids in back, it’s now necessary to move up to the $41,535 Touring model, which includes the six-speed transmission, parking sensors, a center armrest for the third row, and third-row sun shades. The top-spec Touring Elite—or what we like to think of as the Acura of minivans—adds a 12-speaker, 5.1-channel surround-sound system; the 16.2-inch widescreen rear monitor (which can display two inputs side by side); an HDMI input; HID headlights; and a blind-spot monitoring system, all for $44,030. As to availability, you’ll be able to buy the 2011 Odyssey of your dreams at the end of this month.

Even with all of the improvements, the stickers for carry-over trims stay close to 2010 levels, although the all-new Elite extends the price range upward. A full 100 percent of purse carriers should be happy with that.

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10q3/2011_honda_odyssey-first_drive_review

Car and Driver: 2010 Honda Insight - Long-Term Road Test Intro


Not quite the engineering marvel its predecessor was, Honda’s Insight hybrid starts its 40,000-mile journey with us.
BY AARON ROBINSON, PHOTOGRAPHY BY MARC URBANO AND THE MANUFACTURER March 2010
Date: March 2010
Current Mileage/Months in Fleet: 2075/2 monthsAverage Fuel Economy/Range: 37 mpg/392 miles
Service: $0
Normal Wear: $0
Repair: $0

A decade ago, Honda’s skunkworks released both the original aluminum-bodied Insight hybrid and the Honda S2000, at about the same time. Honda’s engineers were heard to comment that compared to the Insight, the S2000 was “the easy one.” We put 40,000 miles on that original two-door, hand-built Insight and got 48 mpg, a figure that, while fabulous by itself, was slightly disappointing given the EPA window-sticker numbers of 61 city, 70 highway.

Down to Basics
Since that original Insight, the EPA has changed the way it computes mileage to lessen the advantage for gas-electric vehicles, and the Toyota Prius has made hybrids mainstream. It’s no surprise that Honda seems to be mimicking the Prius’s successful formula right down to its hatchback DustBuster styling. Gone is the rocket-age aluminum construction with its exotic thixotropic castings. The new Insight is all steel, to hold down costs.

The 1.0-liter three-cylinder is now a 1.3-liter four-cylinder, and the optional five-speed manual that helped the original Insight supply decent entertainment value is gone. A continuously variable automatic does the transmitting, with paddle shifters on the steering wheel in case you want ratio control.

The hybrid system works pretty much the same, however. A 13-hp, 58-lb-ft brushless DC electric motor is parked between the engine (88 hp, 88 lb-ft) and CVT transmission. Total combined output is 98 hp and 123 lb-ft. The motor boosts the engine’s output when the driver summons its services with the gas pedal, and replenishes the nickel-metal-hydride battery as a generator during coasting and braking. Unlike the Prius’s, however, the Insight’s electric motor cannot move the vehicle on its own.

The Insight’s window-sticker numbers are now 40 mpg in the city and 43 mpg on the highway, reflecting the new car’s higher weight (about 850 pounds more than its featherweight predecessor, though a still-modest 2730 pounds), its larger engine, and the changes to the EPA test procedure. Thus far we’re seeing about 37 mpg on average, which, while not the advertised mileage, probably reflects typical Car and Driver driving patterns.

With even the thirstiest fill-ups of the 10.6-gallon fuel tank usually being no more than nine gallons, fuel stops are NASCAR-quick, and 400-mile transits of California’s nether regions seem to go by at an agreeably rapid rate. It’s a good idea to carry an empty bottle in the car if you’re really trying to make time, for the Insight usually needs a fill-up less often than you need a draining.

Our no-options, $23,810 Insight is an EX with Navigation model, or the top-of-the-line Insight with navigation, Bluetooth capability, stability control, 15-inch alloy wheels, and a stereo upgrade that includes XM satellite radio among the amenities installed above the base $20,510 LX.

A Good Start
We embarked from Honda’s Torrance, California, headquarters in late January, the car showing fewer than 60 miles on the clock. Within a month we had already piled on more than 2000 miles. Three road trips to northern California have given us lots of exposure to the Insight’s highly comfortable front chairs. The Insight is happy with 75 mph on the long, flat, ruler-straight I-5 through California’s Great Central Valley, so we find it best to just set the cruise, sit back and, for once, not be in a hurry. Amazingly, we still have managed to get pulled over by the CHiPs, though in this case the officer just wanted to double-check the car’s registration against its distributor license plate. Sometimes, it feels like we’re just big magnets to the iron filings of the Highway Patrol.

We’re still getting used to the hybrid system. It offers two modes, a normal and an Econ mode, the latter activated by a large green button to the left of the steering column. We’ve run the miles about half in Econ, half not, and noticed about a six-percent improvement with the former.

However, the Econ mode limits acceleration and cycles off the air conditioner more frequently.

The idle-stop function kills the engine when the car is running but stationary. However, it seems to operate by inscrutable rules. It sometimes restarts for no apparent reason, or doesn’t stop for the same mysterious reason. Pull into your driveway and stop and it’ll shut down—until you put the car in park, at which point it fires up again . . . for a few seconds until you switch it off with the key. This is a hybrid system that prefers to stay busy.

With another 38,000 miles left to go, we’re looking forward to learning the Insight’s as-yet-unrevealed secrets.

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10q1/2010_honda_insight-long-term_road_test_intro

Car and Driver Magazine: 2010 Acura ZDX - Short Take Road Test

We’re tempted to believe that ZDX stands for “zero demand expected.” The new Acura ZDX is one of those genre-less oddballs that occasionally comes along, like the Subaru Baja and the BMW X6. They slip past the guardians of sanity at their home offices and drift into the market like pollen wafting on a breeze of optimism.

They often die quickly and are flushed.

Long ago we described just such a spore, the AMC Gremlin, as a Hornet with the useful space hacked out of it. Behold the 21st-century version: Acura’s MDX luxury people mover with at least some of the useful space hacked—no, that’s old-fashioned, it’s been carefully shaved, planed, and CNC-milled out of it.

This is styling that takes a toll. To make a ZDX, an entire seat row from the MDX goes sayonara, as does about 35 percent of the cargo space with the seats folded. Width and wheelbase remain unchanged from the MDX, and length grows slightly, but the ZDX’s roof is more than five inches lower, pruning just over three inches from the rear-seat headroom.

Getting in back involves a limbo stoop under the low-cut opening. Have first aid at the ready because foreheads will be whacked, and an ungoggled eye or two may be poked by the rear-door glass, which comes to a menacing point at the concealed door handles.

The upside? At least one seven-year-old thought the ZDX was the coolest vehicle he’d ever seen. There are, like, 22-hundred-thousand buttons and a huge sunroof to stand up in and secret compartments in the back for ninja stuff and you can fly to Alaska in three seconds on the navigation screen and you can open the remote-control hatchback from about a mile away. And stuff.

All of which is ironic, as the ZDX will appeal mainly to people who don’t have kids. Acura predicts sales of just 6000 ZDXs per year, knowing full well that in America’s vastness one could find 6000 buyers for cars with square wheels.

Prices should start in the mid-40s, slightly higher than the MDX, but one like our test car, with the extra hundred-thousand buttons of the Technology package (upgraded leather, nav system, premium audio, backup camera, and more) and the Advance package (adaptive cruise control, adjustable suspension, blind-spot warning, precollision warning, etc.), will land in the mid-50s.

Feature to feature, it’s less costly than the 300-hp BMW X6 xDrive 35i, which starts at $57,125, but that’s like saying an aardvark makes a better pet than an ostrich.

The ZDX isn’t lazy, hitting 60 mph in 6.4 seconds, rather fleet considering the 4421-pound curb weight (about 175 pounds lighter than an MDX). The 3.7-liter V-6 makes 300 horsepower, as it does in the MDX, and the new six-speed automatic and cylinder-cutoff system are mileage stretchers. We saw 20 mpg.

Nor does the ZDX fear a curve. It’s a confident, stable handler, thanks to some steering-feel improvements Acura made after our initial write-up. Also credit the system named with our favorite Japanese hyperbole, Super Handling All-Wheel Drive. When understeer attacks, the system overdrives the outside rear wheel to help turn this big bronco. It works.

On the pricey Advance-pack version, the electronic suspension—the “integrated dynamic system”—takes a page from the Corvette by fitting magnetorheological shock absorbers, or shocks filled with a fluid that changes viscosity—and thus stiffness—in instant concert with changes to electrical current. As with SH-AWD, this widget also works wonders, both restraining body motion and soothing over freeway impacts.

Acura supplies a dash dial to select comfort or sport modes. If, as expected, the ZDX spends most of its time circulating on city grids, it’s best to leave it in comfort mode and tape over the switch with a picture of your seven-year-old nephew, the one who thinks you’re Batman.

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q4/2010_acura_zdx-short_take_road_test

2010 Honda Accord Crosstour 4WD - Short Take Road Test

Honda compromises the Accord in search of more versatility.
BY MIKE SUTTON November 2009

Honda pumped up the Accord into large-car territory in 2008, once again improving the perennial 10Bester’s refinement and packaging without diminishing its dynamic excellence. Now the Accord Crosstour wagon joins the lineup for 2010, demonstrating that Honda is willing to sacrifice that trait, along with the sedan’s already questionable looks, for greater functionality.

Accord-Plus Package
Sharing the Accord’s chassis, as well as its optional 271-hp, 3.5-liter V-6 and five-speed automatic—a four-cylinder isn’t offered—the Crosstour is Honda’s answer to vehicles such as the Toyota Venza and the Subaru Outback, which offer all-wheel drive and squeeze the better part of a crossover’s five-door utility into a lower-profile wrapper.

It certainly looks like an Accord inside, mostly because it shares the same instrument panel. But the Crosstour is far more spacious, with 26 cubic feet of cargo room behind the second row—the sedan’s trunk holds 14 cubes—and the area is nicely finished with loop-pile carpet, release handles for the rear seats (cargo space expands to 51 cubic feet), and a removable storage bin under the floor that could double as an ice chest for tailgating.

The narrow, split-glass hatch, however, impedes rear visibility and must be manually opened and closed. Its canted design combined with the sloping roof also limits interior volume, with the more squared-off Venza and Outback both offering 34 cubes behind the second row and about 70 with the rear chairs stowed. Rear-seat headroom is adequate for six-plus footers.

Accord-Minus Result
Despite the added, albeit compromised, utility, the exterior shape that allows the extra room is difficult to swallow. The styling is bulbous and frumpy and makes the Crosstour look like a supersized Insight hybrid on stilts. And it’s not light; about 300 pounds more than a V-6 Accord to start and an additional couple hundred pounds for all-wheel drive, which overtaxes the CR-V–size brakes under heavy use.

With steering that’s not as crisp, as well as a loftier perch and larger tires on 17- or 18-inch wheels, the Crosstour is no Accord sedan on the road. But it is not completely sensory depriving like most crossovers. That’s because it is a wagon, and it retains most of the sedan’s overall composure.

Although the five-speed automatic lacks the extra cog of the Venza and the manumatic-shifting mode of nearly everything else, it’s been programmed to hang on to gears longer when the stability control system's wheel-speed sensors detect you’re pushing the vehicle through corners, or when going up or down steep grades. While the Crosstour’s 1500-pound tow rating provides it with enough utility to haul a couple of jet skis, its six inches of ground clearance mean it won’t get over much more than a small snow drift.

We recorded a 7.2-second 0­­­–60 dash and a 15.4-second quarter-mile run at 92 mph with the Honda, which are respectable numbers but only slightly quicker than those of the lighter Outback with the optional 256-hp, 3.6-liter flat-six (7.4 and 15.7 seconds, respectively). A Venza with the 3.5-liter V-6, all-wheel drive, and an additional 127 pounds to lug around, however, is more than a half-second quicker in both measures and can stop from 70 mph in 18 fewer feet (169 versus the Honda’s 187).

Competitive But Compromised
Honda expects to sell about 40,000 Crosstours annually to empty-nesters who are averse to bulky crossovers yet still need some versatility. Billed as the premium model in the Accord range, prices start at $30,380 for front-drivers—about three grand above a V-6 Accord sedan—and approach $37,000 for one like our test car, with all-wheel drive and navigation. Comparable Venzas and Outbacks both top out similarly, but also offer four-cylinder options for thousands less, and the Subaru includes standard all-wheel drive.

Fuel economy just one or two mpg less than an Accord V-6’s should help with Crosstour sales—we averaged 21 mpg with our tester, which has a city/highway rating of 17/25—but a conventional Accord wagon likely would have served the same role. And would have looked better doing it.

Highs: Still a sweet-driving Accord, now with nearly twice the cargo space.

Lows: Questionable looks, no four-cylinder option, and why does an Accord wagon have to weigh two tons?

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 5-door wagon
PRICE AS TESTED: $36,930 (base price: $34,730)
ENGINE TYPE: SOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 212 cu in, 3471ccPower (SAE net): 271 bhp @ 6200 rpmTorque (SAE net): 254 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 5-speed automatic
DIMENSIONS:Wheelbase: 110.1 in Length: 196.8 inWidth: 74.7 in Height: 65.7 inCurb weight: 4068 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS: Zero to 60 mph: 7.2 secZero to 100 mph: 18.6 secZero to 120 mph: 30.6 secStreet start, 5–60 mph: 7.5 secStanding ¼-mile: 15.6 sec @ 92 mphTop speed (governor limited): 121 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 187 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.80 g
FUEL ECONOMY:EPA city/highway driving: 17/25 mpgC/D observed: 21 mpg

Source;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q4/2010_honda_accord_crosstour_4wd-short_take_road_test