Showing posts with label Suzuki. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Suzuki. Show all posts

Is Suzuki in enough trouble for a Swan Song?

Ouch, a bleak article on a brand that had potential....
Brand's presence shrinks in U.S.
by Ryan Beene of Automotive News


Struggling Suzuki is shrinking in many ways.


Insiders say the company is slashing marketing while sales and the dealer roster dwindle.
The many signs of trouble:


-- In a market up 13 percent through March, Suzuki was down 2 percent to just 6,561 sales.


-- The brand skipped the Detroit and Los Angeles auto shows this year and suspended social media activity on Twitter and Facebook two months ago.


-- Steve Younan, the top U.S. product planning and marketing executive, left in January and will not be replaced. No national TV commercials have aired since 2009.


-- In January, Suzuki stopped getting customer satisfaction data from J.D. Power and Associates


-- data that help track dealer performance. A memo obtained by Automotive News says another vendor will replace Power, but sources say no successor has surfaced.


-- The dealer body continues to shrink. The brand shed 32 franchises last year, nearly 12 percent of its total. The number of U.S. Suzuki franchises has dropped every year since 2005.

The company's strategy has become "very much focused on short-term profitability," says one source familiar with the company's recent cost-cutting moves who spoke on condition of anonymity. "They're limiting their future in the U.S."


Nobody at American Suzuki wants to talk about the troubles and the strategy for battling them. But Suzuki's hard-pressed dealers are feeling the pain.


"At one point I really thought they were going to support it, but it was kind of like a downward spiral -- no sales, no money, no advertising," says former dealer Bill Kay, who dropped his Suzuki franchise last summer even though he had a vacant Chrysler dealership in suburban Chicago available for Suzuki.

Bare Minimum

Seiichi Maruyama, former president of Suzuki Canada, was named president of American Suzuki last April. Takashi Iwatsuki, chairman of American Suzuki, arrived in California at the same time to help steer the company after being previously based in Japan.


Maruyama and Iwatsuki have been cutting costs wherever possible, sources say. And Suzuki's global parent is wrestling with falling sales in various key markets.


"They seem to be more interested in controlling expenses than increasing revenue," said a second source, who also asked not to be identified.


The casualties in the United States have been many tools that most automakers use to promote their brand and products.


The last Facebook and Twitter presence was Feb. 6. After skipping auto shows in Los Angeles in November and Detroit in January, Suzuki displayed vehicles this year at the Chicago and New York shows, but freshened versions of the SX4 subcompact and Grand Vitara SUV, expected to arrive this year, were not among them.


The changes to the vehicles are the first cosmetic updates to Suzuki's meager four-vehicle lineup in more than two years.

"The strange thing to me is, even at this bare minimum, when the opportunity is presented to make some news and provide something positive for customers and the dealers, they avoid it," the first source says.


Suzuki's newest vehicle, the Kizashi mid-sized sedan, went on sale in late 2009. Its SX4 subcompact has been on the market since 2007 with few updates. The current-generation Grand Vitara SUV has been around since the 2006 model year, and the Equator pickup, essentially a rebadged Nissan Frontier, arrived in November 2008.


In 2007, Suzuki's U.S. sales reached 101,884. But last year they dropped to just 26,618.

No CSI SSI

In the memo announcing the termination of the J.D. Power customer satisfaction data, Chris White, Suzuki's sales director, told dealers that Suzuki planned to sign a different vendor within four to six months to provide the scores. But no sign of a successor has surfaced.


"A lot of fundamental things that car companies need to track when they're operating, they were just jettisoning for the sake of saving costs," the first source says.


Some marketing efforts have continued. Suzuki produced a regional TV commercial for the 2012 Super Bowl to promote the Kizashi that ran in about 20 markets. And a few regional TV spots have followed.


Few sales, 'terrible' margin
Suzuki's troubles and its lack of marketing have led many dealers to call it quits. Former dealer Kay in suburban Chicago says his store sold fewer than 10 new Suzukis in an average month before he bailed out last summer. The few vehicles he did sell had "terrible" profit margins, he says, and the dealership had little service work.


Kay, who owns Ford, Chevrolet, Buick-GMC, Honda and Nissan dealerships in Chicago's western suburbs, says poor consumer awareness in his market hindered sales at his dealership.

"The problem is that, while it's not a bad product, it's not on anybody's radar to look at," Kay says.


Low-volume Suzuki dealerships such as Kay's accounted for most of the Suzuki dealers that closed in 2011, says James Morrell, owner of Advantage Suzuki in Albany, N.Y., and chairman of the Suzuki Dealer Advisory Board.

"Suzuki didn't lose any volume because [those] dealers weren't selling any new cars," Morrell says.


He says about 150 of Suzuki's remaining 246 dealers still sell five or fewer new cars per month, despite recent efforts to weed out poorly performing dealers.

In 2010, for example, Suzuki offered 150 of its worst-performing dealers $50,000 to terminate their franchise. About 50 accepted the offer. Suzuki is not offering buyouts now.


But with more than half of its dealers selling five or fewer vehicles in an average month, Suzuki still has many dealers unwilling to focus on Suzuki and adequately promote the brand in their local markets, Morrell says.


Many Suzuki dealers use their franchised-dealer status for easier access to financing to support big used-car operations, Morrell says.


Indeed, Chicago dealer Kay says used-car sales were the primary focus of his Suzuki store. "It didn't seem like there was any possibility of ever increasing the volume enough to support a stand-alone dealership," Kay says.

Still positive
Despite the struggles of many Suzuki dealers, some have found success with stand-alone Suzuki stores.

Greg Sloan, president of Five Star Suzuki in Altoona, Pa., says he has a "very positive" outlook on Suzuki's future U.S. prospects. His dealership, which sells about 60 new vehicles a month, is one of Suzuki's highest-volume U.S. stores.


Sloan expects new and updated products within a few years. He says that many of the failed dealers were not committed to the Suzuki brand.


Sloan advertises heavily in his local market, something most of the smaller-volume dealers failed to do, he says.


"I think that some weak dealers have been weeded out, and I think that there are some dealers that lacked focus in retailing Suzukis by the wayside and we're left with guys who are really focused," Sloan says. "There's nowhere to go but up."

Source;

Suzuki Xl7

The Suzuki XL-7 is Suzuki's mid-sized SUV, launched in 1998.The first-generation XL-7 was a Suzuki design and was essentially a stretched Grand Vitara. It had a Suzuki-designed 2.7 liter V6 on a rear wheel drive-based platform with optional four wheel drive. When introduced, the XL-7 was the least expensive SUV available with 3-row seating in North America. The Suzuki XL-7 sold over 20,000 a year, and was awarded the Consumer's Digest Best Buy award. However, sales slowed as competitors came out with SUVs with more features, lower prices, better fuel efficiency and more powerful engines, such as the Toyota Highlander, the Honda Pilot, and the Honda CR-V.A unique trait in the U.S. market in this segment, the XL-7 was available with 5-speed manual transmission, in both 5-person and 7-person variants. Introduced in the fourth quarter of 2006, Suzuki partnered with General Motors to build the 2007 model, now called XL7 (without the hyphen). It uses the same unibody platform and many of the same components as the Chevy Equinox, Pontiac Torrent and Saturn Vue, but incorporates third row seating exclusive to the Suzuki. The second generation model uses a version of the GM High Feature engine, built in Japan and shipped to CAMI Automotive in Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada, where the XL7 is assembled with the Equinox and Torrent, and also the second-generation Suzuki XL7 is Suzuki's first entry in the crossover SUV segment. Styling cues on the 2007 include a chrome slotted grille and trapezoidal headlights.In May 2009, Suzuki halted production of the XL7 indefinitely due to low demand. Through May 10, 2009, CAMI Automotive Inc. had only produced four XL7s for Suzuki after producing more than 12,000 units last year.



The all-new XL7 was designed to blend SUV versatility and safety with increased driver and passenger comfort," said Koji Yamada, chief engineer, XL7. "The XL7 not only offers the cargo and seating flexibility for all aspects of a consumer's active lifestyle, but performance capabilities and safety features that give them the confidence of being in control. The all-new 2007 Suzuki XL7 evolves from a rear-wheel-drive, truck chassis SUV into a crossover SUV based on the sophisticated GM Theta platform with full-length underbody rails for added strength. The XL7 is now a front-wheel-drive vehicle that features four-wheel independent suspension and available all-wheel drive. The standard powertrain for the Suzuki XL7 is a GM-designed, Suzuki-built 3.6-liter, V6 DOHC engine rated at an estimated 250 hp with 243 lb-ft of torque. The XL7's 3.6-liter, High Feature (HF) engine with variable valve timing will be built under license by Suzuki in Japan using Suzuki engine-building technology at the Sagara engine plant. The XL7 engine was developed as a joint effort between Suzuki and GM engineering and features unique Engine Control Unit (ECU) calibration. The use of the existing platform architecture accelerated the completion of the vehicle, which has been in development for three years. The 3.6-liter, six-cylinder, DOHC engine is matched to a five-speed automatic transmission that features a manual-shifting (manumatic) mode. Although the new engine is nearly one liter larger than the 2.7-liter engine used in the previous XL-7, the new, larger XL7 was designed to deliver fuel economy equal to or better than its predecessor. EPA fuel economy estimates are 18 mpg/city and 24 mpg/highway for front-wheel-drive variants and 17 mpg/city and 23 mpg/highway for all-wheel drive. Towing capacity is rated at 3,500 pounds.



The sophisticated chassis delivers nimble, car-like ride and comfort whether driving on the highway, city streets or rural roads. The XL7's responsive road manners communicate a sense of confidence and control in virtually every driving scenario, while still providing refined Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) performance at or near the top of the midsize SUV category. The XL7 features four-wheel independent suspension with MacPherson struts in the front and a multilink design in the rear. The independent rear suspension is fitted with hydraulic shock absorbers in the five-passenger configuration and Nivomat self-leveling rear shock absorbers when configured for the available seven-passenger design. The all-new XL7 is fitted with a true dual exhaust system, constructed of durable, long-lasting stainless steel. The system was designed for quiet, refined exhaust tones to achieve "best in class" NVH in terms of quietness and tonal quality. The exhaust system features two downpipes, two catalytic converters, a center muffler, two side mufflers and two 3.5-inch diameter exhaust tips.The XL7's safety features start with the body structure itself -- a combination of computer-designed high-strength, dual-phase and galvanized steels. The body structure is computer-designed to manage loads -- to effectively transfer energy absorbed during impacts around the interior compartment and occupants -- in both front and rear crashes.The unibody construction is a high-strength steel structure, incorporating full-length frame rails and a safety cage in the middle into a single, welded unit. It also is designed with front and rear crush zones engineered to collapse in a controlled manner to help absorb crash energy while protecting the integrity of the occupant safety cage.The safety cage is reinforced with welded, tubular-section members that frame door openings and support the roof and steel members in the doors. The combination of single-piece door aperture and door beam reinforcements help resist side-impact intrusion.

Osamu Suzuki Blog Bombs Volkswagen

Interesting.... did not see this one coming....Things are not going well between Volkswagen and Suzuki. In 2009, Volkswagen invested $2.5 billion for a 19.9 percent share in Suzuki. Suzuki sent $1.13 billion back and bought 2.5 percent of Volkswagen. Suzuki netted $1.37 billion, domo arigatou gozaimasu, but then nothing happened. End of last year, Ferdinand Piech became impatient. Volkswagen stockholders asked discomforting questions at the annual meeting. Now, it turned into a war of the words. Volkswagen uses old media. The octogenarian Osamu Suzuki drops a massive blog bomb on Wolfsburg.

A month ago, Volkswagen leaked to Der Spiegel that the German-Nipponese axis is “a big disappointment.” Old prejudices were unearthed. “Suzuki wants as much modern technology as possible from Volkswagen, but is not willing to reciprocate,” wrote Der Spiegel after an obvious (but unsaid) tête-à-tête with Martin Winterkorn, who allegedly said that “the Japanese still need some training in proper cooperation.”

Now, Osamu Suzuki fires back. He could have summoned a few trusted Japanese journos and dropped some deniable off-the-record remarks. He did not. He sat down and wrote a blog that was published in The Nikkei [sub] in the Japanese language. Suzuki uses strong language:

•“Since the companies differ in size, people of Volkswagen may develop a mistaken impression that Suzuki is placed under their umbrella.”
•“The initial basic agreement seems to falter.”
•“We learnt about Volkswagen’s technologies, but we did not find any one of them interesting enough to adopt immediately.”
•“If we are short of any technology, we have an option to ask other companies with which we benefit from technological exchanges.”

Oddly enough, the piece never made it to the English wire of The Nikkei, and a Google search tells me that it was only circulated in Japan. Here is what I believe is a faithful translation from the Japanese, uncut.

“Blog by Osamu Suzuki

Present and future of cooperation between Suzuki and Volkswagen

It has been one and a half years since Suzuki signed a partnership with Volkswagen in December 2009. Many people criticized us for being unable to announce any specific fruit of the cooperation. Let me summarize what I have in my mind.

Lately, people of Volkswagen are telling their shareholders that Volkswagen can largely influence the corporate policy of Suzuki. I feel somewhat uncomfortable with the statement because the two companies agreed to remain independent partners on an equal footing when we signed the partnership in the first place. Since the companies differ in size, people of Volkswagen may develop a mistaken impression that Suzuki is placed under their umbrella. However, Suzuki signed the agreement under the condition of being an equal partner. Thus we cannot simply accept this notion. The two companies have been having a lot of exchanges. We learnt more about Volkswagen. I assume that Volkswagen gradually developed understanding about Suzuki. As a result, the initial basic agreement seems to falter.

Does Suzuki face an immediate difficulty? The answer is “Not at all.” We learnt about Volkswagen’s technologies, but we did not find any one of them interesting enough to adopt immediately. Suzuki is working on its own green technologies. Our engineers are gaining more capabilities than I expected, and are developing surprisingly good technologies. For example, our new minicar engine that was developed for the first time after 16 years enjoys class-leading fuel efficiency in Japan. We are producing more than 200,000 units of our diesel engine, which is attracting a lot of attention, in India. Thus for the time being, particularly in critical markets like the minicar market and India, we are not in a hurry to collaborate with Volkswagen. Suzuki is also working on eco-friendly cars. One example is our original EV equipped with a standby generator, which is under development for commercialization.

If we are short of any technology, we have an option to ask other companies with which we benefit from technological exchanges. Supply of diesel engine from Fiat that was announced the other day is one example. Technology race intensifies in the auto industry. The scheme of capital participation to take control of another carmaker will no longer work. We need to remain independent to be perceived as an attractive partner by other automakers around the world. According to a recent report by a major German business magazine, Volkswagen seems to gain visibility of developing low-priced cars for emerging markets such as South America and India. I am relieved.

I assume that many of you are interested in what would happen to Suzuki’s relationship with Volkswagen. We intend to continue having dialogues in all sincerity with our partner in order to build a relationship of equality. After all, this has been the purpose of joining hands with Volkswagen. I will do my utmost to develop Suzuki into an independent and distinctive company, and measure up to our shareholders’ and users’ expectations.

I am increasingly excited in face of many challenges. Recovery from the earthquake is urgent. We have to do it NOW. I am certainly older, but I am ready to continue working hard with the employees of Suzuki.”

Source;
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/07/osamo-suzuki-blog-bombs-volkswagen/#more-401798

Ward's: Smaller Players at Risk, Too

By Jerry FlintWardsAuto.com,
Feb 9, 2009 9:20 AM

We all know General Motors and Chrysler are at risk of going bankrupt in the U.S. But are they the only auto makers on the edge?

Toyota, Honda (phew) and Nissan may be losing money here, but they certainly will survive. Likewise, BMW Mercedes and Porsche are in no danger. But what about Mitsubishi, Suzuki, Subaru, Saab, Volvo and even Volkswagen?

Frankly, some of these companies may fold their tents in North America. They’ve been struggling for years in the U.S. and this is not likely to change soon.

I don’t dislike any of these auto makers, but look at their circumstances: Mitsubishi has a UAW-represented factory in Illinois capable of building more than 200,000 vehicles annually. This year production fell to 58,000 units from 79,000 last year. Sales in 2008 totaled just 97,000 vehicles, compared with 260,000 a decade ago.

Suzuki is a significant global player, the No.1 car maker in India. It sells cross/utility vehicles and pickups in the U.S, but it is best known here for small cars and motorcycles. Suzuki has an assembly plant in Canada, a joint venture with GM. But the plant turned out fewer than 13,000 Suzuki cars last year, against prior year’s 32,000.

Suzuki sales were 85,000 last year in the U.S. against 102,000 in 2007. Again, I like Suzuki, but its marketing budget can’t compete with the big boys.

Subaru cars generally are very good. The auto maker pioneered all-wheel-drive cars in the U.S., and you could say it invented the CUV with its Outback model. Yet, Subaru built just 92,000 vehicles in 2008 in its Indiana (again UAW) plant, against 109,000 in 2007.

Now Toyota has a piece of Subaru and is producing cars in the plant, too, which pushed total production to 183,000 units, more than the 147,000 produced in 2007. Subaru’s 2008 sales of 188,000 in the U.S. actually were up a notch from 2007, and up in January, too, while almost every other auto maker saw sales fall off a cliff.

Still, Subaru never has been able to become a volume player. If Toyota were not using the production capacity, the Indiana plant would be a huge financial drain.

Mitsubishi, Suzuki and Subaru all suffer from the same problem: They don’t have enough money and marketing muscle to compete with the likes of Toyota, Honda and Nissan.

Then there is Volkswagen. Talk about dreaming big. VW is building a new plant in Tennessee, and its executives are talking about tripling U.S. sales in 10 years to 1 million (including 200,000 Audis). I’ll give VW credit; last year was not a bad year, with sales down only 4% in 2008, while the market as a whole dropped a horrific 18%. And everybody seems to like the new Jetta diesel.
But VW has lost billions in the U.S. in recent years and may have lost money last year, too. Tripling sales to a million? In the dismal economic environment of the next few years, this sounds like a fantasy.

Here’s the problem. Most car buyers think of Volkswagen as a low-priced car. But VW can’t keep prices low when it imports cars and components from Europe, not with the strong euro. And it has trouble selling higher-priced models with the VW logo on the hood.

A new Tennessee plant will give VW great growth potential, but the dealership network is weak after decades of poor sales, and executives in Germany don’t seem to understand the U.S. market.

Meanwhile, GM’s Saab and Ford’s Volvo continue to struggle. Both build fine cars but are terribly squeezed for marketing money.

The point is there are other auto makers in bad shape in the U.S. besides Detroit nameplates. If all the companies mentioned here quit the U.S., we’re talking 800,000 cars and trucks. Imagine how the U.S. market would change if that volume were split up among the survivors,

Source;
http://wardsauto.com/commentary/smaller_players_risk_090209/